Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Funding Acknowledgment: The SGC is a registered charity (number 1097737) that receives funds from AbbVie, Bayer Pharma AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Canada Foundation for Innovation, Eshelman Institute for Innovation, Genome Canada through Ontario Genomics Institute [OGI-055], Innovative Medicines Initiative (EU/EFPIA) [ULTRA-DD grant no. 115766], Janssen, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, MSD, Novartis Pharma AG, Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation, and Science (MRIS), Pfizer, São Paulo Research Foundation-FAPESP, Takeda, and Wellcome.
My goal is to test whether retrospective virtual screening approaches can guide the design of PROTACs. As a first step, I showed that HADDOCK was the best protein-protein docking tool among those I tested to predict how E3 ligases interact with their protein substrates. Here, I ask whether docking virtual libraries of PROTAC candidates to these E3 ligase – substrate protein interfaces can be used to predict which PROTACs are active.
Virtual Screening, PROTACs, E3-ligase, Target Protein
Virtual Screening, PROTACs, E3-ligase, Target Protein
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 15 | |
| downloads | 23 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts