Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Critical Assessment of RNA-Seq Differential Expression

Authors: Warden, Charles;

Critical Assessment of RNA-Seq Differential Expression

Abstract

Warden and Wu Preprint: v1 In general, this primarily focuses on the following types of comparisons: Cell line experiments with over-expression or knock-down to define a known causal gene, with processing starting with public reads. Processed TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) data for breast cancer (BRCA) to compare gene expression by immunohistochemistry status (ER/ESR1, PR/PGR, or HER2/ERBB2). Differential expression methods include the following: edgeR (GLM) edgeR-robust (GLM) edgeR (QL) edgeR-robust (QL) DESeq1 DESeq2 limma-voom limma-trend (CPM) limma-trend (FPKM/RPKM) ANOVA (log2 FRPKM/RPKM) The most common preprocessing strategies include STAR, TopHat2, and Salmon. However, a limited amount of additional processing with HISAT2, kallisto, Bowtie2 (+eXpress), and Bowtie1 (+RSEM) is also provided. Most STAR and TopHat2 alignments use htseq-count for quantification, as well as running cuffdiff (for single variable 2-group comparisons). However, a limited amount of additional processing with featureCounts is also provided. Most STAR and TopHat2 alignments start with the public forward reads, even if paired-end data was available.

For an earlier version of the templates for RNA-Seq analysis, acknowledgements were listed for labs in a subfolder of the GitHub repository. So, we would like to provide similar acknowledgements for labs supported since that time (in a similar way). Namely, we would also like to thank the following users that gave us permission to acknowledge these templates (or scripts similar to these templates) were used for analysis of their data: Ke Ma (with lab members Xuekai Xiong, Weini Li, and Tali Kiperman), Saul Priceman (with lab members Yukiko Yamaguchi, Hee Jun/Eric Lee, Anthony Park, and John Murad), Jose Enrique Montero Casimiro / Bart Roep (with Veronica Lifshitz and David Arribas-Layton), Rebecca Deegan (UNMC, with lab member Elizabeth Kosmacek), James Figarola (with lab member Jyotsana Singhal and collaborator Josh Tompkins), Linda Malkas (with lab member Robert Lingeman), and Stephen Forman / Christine Brown (with lab member Dongrui Wang). There are also 5 internal collaborators with whom there was not clear confirmation for approval; however, this acknowledgement can be updated in the future.

While the analysis has to come as a secondary priority to other responsibilities, this data set can serve at least two purposes: 1) Provide an experimental public lab notebook / log for an on-going experiment: https://sourceforge.net/projects/rnaseq-deg-methodlimit/files/LOG.txt 2) Provided an updated citation for RNA-Seq methods used for core support (at least for Charles Warden). In the meantime, the best citation to use is probably the GitHub acknowledgements: https://github.com/cwarden45/RNAseq_templates/blob/master/TopHat_Workflow/README.md

Keywords

edgeR, over-expression, knock-down, DESeq2, RNA-Seq, Differential Expression, limma-voom

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research