Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A DOSIMETRIC COMPARISION OF BLADDER AND RECTAL VOLUMETRIC DOSES IN 3D– CT BASED HDR INTRACAVITARY BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CERVICAL CANCER USING TWO RECTAL RETRACTION METHODS

Authors: Dr. Anish Dasgupta, Dr. Barnini Ghosh, Dr. Souransu Sen, Dr. Arnab Adhikary & Dr. Debabrata Mitra;

A DOSIMETRIC COMPARISION OF BLADDER AND RECTAL VOLUMETRIC DOSES IN 3D– CT BASED HDR INTRACAVITARY BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CERVICAL CANCER USING TWO RECTAL RETRACTION METHODS

Abstract

Introduction: Cervical cancer is a common malignancy among women in India. For locally advanced stages, standard treatment consists of concurrent chemoradiation along with brachytherapy. Most commonly, intracavitary brachytherapy is used. To reduce the radiation dose to the rectum, a rectal retractor is often used. This is sometimes done with vaginal gauze packing also. Aims: To find out the variation in dosimetric parameters in patients who received 3D CT based intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer based on two rectal retraction methods and if one is dosimetrically non inferior to the other. Methods: FIGO Stage IIB cervical cancer patients, who received intracavitary brachytherapy with Manchester-style applicator after concurrent chemoradiation, were randomised to either rectal retractor or vaginal gauze packing. Dosimetric parameters of D2cc, V50, Dmax, for rectum and bladder were obtained, along with volume contoured. Paired t-test done for results. Results: Using t test, the variation in V50 for bladder with and without rectal retractor was significant (p=0.017), favouring the arm with packing, but for rectum, it was not statistically significant (p=0.08). Variation in D2cc for bladder (p=0.09) and rectum (p=0.1) was not significant between the two arms. Conclusion: Vaginal gauze packing may be considered a dosimetrically non inferior substitute to rectal retractor, provided it is done in an adequate manner.

Keywords

Cervical cancer, HDR Brachytherapy, Rectal retractor

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 4
    download downloads 1
  • 4
    views
    1
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
4
1
Green
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research