Views provided by UsageCounts
This is my submission to the MICCAI Educational Challenge 2019. You can run the notebook on Google Colab or render an already executed version on nbviewer. Combining the power of PyTorch and NiftyNet NiftyNet is "an open source convolutional neural networks platform for medical image analysis and image-guided therapy" built on top of TensorFlow. Due to its available implementations of successful architectures, patch-based sampling and straightforward configuration, it has become a popular choice to get started with deep learning in medical imaging. PyTorch is "an open source deep learning platform that provides a seamless path from research prototyping to production deployment". It is low-level enough to offer a lot of control over what is going on under the hood during training, and its dynamic computational graph allows for easy debugging. Being a generic deep learning framework, it is not tailored to the needs of the medical imaging field, although its popularity in this field is increasing rapidly. One can extend a NiftyNet application, but it is not straightforward without being familiar with the framework and fluent in TensorFlow 1.X. Therefore it can be convenient to implement applications in PyTorch using NiftyNet models and functionalities. In particular, combining both frameworks allows for fast architecture experimentation and transfer learning. So why not use both? In this tutorial we will port the parameters of a model trained on NiftyNet to a PyTorch model and compare the results of running an inference using both frameworks.
tensorflow, pytorch, niftynet, medical image processing, image segmentation
tensorflow, pytorch, niftynet, medical image processing, image segmentation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 18 |

Views provided by UsageCounts