Downloads provided by UsageCounts
A total of 22 software defect datasets with format ARFF. AEEEM was collected by D’Ambros et al. [1], PROMISE was prepared by Jureczko and Madeyski [2], and JIRA is a new repository of highly-curated defect datasets collected by Yatish et al. [3]. [1] M. D’Ambros, M. Lanza, and R. Robbes, “Evaluating defect prediction approaches: A benchmark and an extensive comparison,”Empirical Softw. Engg., vol. 17, no. 4-5, pp. 531–577, Aug. 2012. [2] M. Jureczko and L. Madeyski, “Towards identifying software project clusters with regard to defect prediction,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, ser. PROMISE ’10. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2010, pp. 9:1–9:10. [3] S. Yatish, J. Jiarpakdee, P. Thongtanunam, and C. Tantithamthavorn,“Mining software defects: Should we consider affected releases?” in The International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), 2019.
software defect prediction, defect datasets
software defect prediction, defect datasets
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 246 | |
| downloads | 175 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts