{"references": ["Abd\u00fch, Muhammed, (\u00f6. 1905), Tefs\u00eeru'l-men\u00e2r/Tefs\u00eeru'l-Kur'\u00e2ni'l-hak\u00eem, Kahire 1336/1922.", "Ahmed b. Hanbel, M\u00fcsned, (\u00f6. 241/855), D\u00e2ru sadr, Beyrut t.s.", "Akp\u0131nar, Ali, \"\u0130\u015f\u00e2r\u00ee Tefs\u00eer ve Ku\u015feyr\u00ee'nin Besmele Tefs\u00eeri\", Tasavvuf Dergisi, y\u0131l. 3, S. IX, Ankara 2002.", "Aydemir, Abdullah, \"Besmele\", Diyanet \u0130lmi Dergi, S. 106-107, Ankara 1971.", "Bedir, Ahmed, \"Ku\u015feyr\u00ee'nin Let\u00e2if\u00fc'l-i\u015f\u00e2r\u00e2t adl\u0131 Tefs\u00eerinde Besmelenin Yorumu\", Harran \u00dcniversitesi \u0130lahiyat Fak\u00fcltesi Dergisi, y\u0131l. 2000.", "Bik\u00e2\u00ee, \u0130brahim b. \u00d6mer, (\u00f6. 885/1480), Nazm\u00fc'd-d\u00fcrer, D\u00e2ru'l-k\u00fct\u00fcbi'l-\u0131lmiyye, Beyrut 2009.", "Cess\u00e2s, Eb\u00fb Bekir, (\u00f6. 370/981) Ahk\u00e2mu'l-Kur'\u00e2n, thk. Muhammed S\u00e2d\u0131k, Beyrut 1985. Demirci, Muhsin, Tefsir Us\u00fbl\u00fc, \u0130stanbul 2006.", "Derman, M. U\u011fur-Uzun, M., \"Besmele-Hat\", T\u00fcrkiye Diyanet Vakf\u0131 \u0130sl\u00e2m Ansiklopedisi, (D\u0130A), \u0130stanbul 1992, V, 532-537.", "Do\u011fan, D. Mehmet, B\u00fcy\u00fck T\u00fcrk\u00e7e S\u00f6zl\u00fck, P\u0131nar Yay\u0131nlar\u0131, \u0130stanbul 2005.", "Elmal\u0131l\u0131, Hamdi Yaz\u0131r (\u00f6. 1942), Hak Dini Kur'\u00e2n Dili, Azim Da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m, \u0130stanbul ts.", "Fahrudd\u00een er-R\u00e2z\u00ee (\u00f6. 606/1209), Mef\u00e2t\u00eehu'l-\u011fayb, \u015eirketi sah\u00e2fiyeyi Osmaniyye, y.y. 1307.", "Fahrudd\u00een er-R\u00e2z\u00ee (\u00f6. 606/1209), Mef\u00e2tihu'l-\u011fayb, \u00e7ev. Suat Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m vd. Ak\u00e7a\u011f Yay\u0131nlar\u0131, Ankara 1988.", "\u0130bn Manz\u00fbr, Ebulfadl (\u00f6. 711/1311), Lis\u00e2n\u00fc'l-Arab, D\u00e2ru'l-fikr, Beyrut 1990.", "\u0130bn Teymiyye, Tak\u0131yyuddin (\u00f6. 728/1328), Mukaddime f\u00ee us\u00fbli't-tefs\u00eer, Batanta 1988.", "K\u0131lavuz, Ahmet S., \"Ak\u00e2id\" T\u00fcrkiye Diyanet Vakf\u0131 \u0130sl\u00e2m Ansiklopedisi, (D\u0130A), \u0130stanbul 1989, II, 212-216.", "Kurtub\u00ee, (\u00f6. 571/1272), el-C\u00e2mi' li ahk\u00e2mi'l-Kur'\u00e2n, thk. Abdullah b. Abd\u00fclmuhsin et-T\u00fcrk\u00ee, M\u00fcesseset\u00fc'r-ris\u00e2le, Beyrut 1427/2006.", "Ku\u015feyr\u00ee, Abd\u00fclkerim (\u00f6. 465/1702), Let\u00e2if\u00fc'l-i\u015f\u00e2r\u00e2t, thk. \u0130brahim Besy\u00fbn\u00ee, Kahire 1081.", "Menn\u00e2u'l-Katt\u00e2n, Meb\u00e2his f\u00ee ul\u00fbmi'l-Kur'\u00e2n, M\u00fcesseset\u00fc'r-ris\u00e2le, Beyrut 2009.", "Nurs\u00ee, Sa\u00eed, (\u00f6. 1962), \u0130\u015f\u00e2rat\u00fc'l-\u0130'c\u00e2z f\u00ee mezanni'l-\u0130c\u00e2z, \u00e7ev. Abd\u00fclmecid Nurs\u00ee, S\u00f6zler Ne\u015f. \u0130stanbul 2005.", "Suy\u00fbt\u00ee, Cel\u00e2ludd\u00een, (\u00f6. 911/1505), el-\u0130tk\u00e2n f\u00ee ul\u00fbmi'l-Kur'\u00e2n, M\u00fcesseset\u00fc'r-ris\u00e2le, Beyrut 2011.", "Suy\u00fbt\u00ee, Cel\u00e2ludd\u00een, (\u00f6. 911/1505), ed-D\u00fcrru'l-mens\u00fbr, D\u00e2ru'l-fikr, Beyrut 1993.", "\u015eafi\u00ee, Muhammed b. \u0130dris (\u00f6. 204/820), Ahk\u00e2mu'l-Kur'\u00e2n, thk. Abd\u00fclgan\u00ee, Beyrut h. 1400.", "\u015een, Ziya, \"\u0130sti\u00e2ze ve Besmele\", Diyanet \u0130lmi Dergi, C. XL, S. 1 Ankara 2004.", "Taber\u00ee, \u0130bn Cer\u00eer (\u00f6. 310/923), C\u00e2miu'l-bey\u00e2n an te'v\u00eeli \u00e2yi'l-Kur'\u00e2n, D\u00e2ru'l-fikr, Beyrut h. 1405.", "Tirmiz\u00ee, Eb\u00fb \u00ces\u00e2 (\u00f6. 279/892), S\u00fcnen, thk. Ahmed Mahmud \u015eakir, \u0130stanbul t.s.", "Tuncer, Faruk, Kur'\u00e2n S\u00fbrelerindeki E\u015fsiz Ahenk, I\u015f\u0131k Yay\u0131nlar\u0131, \u0130stanbul 2003.", "\u00dcnver, Mustafa, Kur'\u00e2n'\u0131 Anlamada Siy\u00e2k'\u0131n Rol\u00fc, Sidre Yay., Ankara 1996.", "Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m, Kur'\u00e2n-\u0131 Kerim ve Kur'\u00e2n \u0130limlerine Giri\u015f, Ensar Ne\u015friyat, V. bs. \u0130stanbul 1996.", "Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m, Suat, \"Besmele\", T\u00fcrkiye Diyanet Vakf\u0131 \u0130sl\u00e2m Ansiklopedisi, (D\u0130A), \u0130stanbul 1992, V, 529-532.", "Y\u0131ld\u0131z, Sak\u0131b, \"\u00c2yet ve S\u00fbreler Aras\u0131ndaki M\u00fcnasebet\", Atat\u00fcrk \u00dcni. \u0130lahiyat Fak. D., S. 7, Erzurum 1986.", "Y\u0131lmaz, Faik, \u00c2yetler ve S\u00fbreler Aras\u0131ndaki M\u00fcn\u00e2sebet, D\u0130B Yay., Ankara 2005.", "Y\u0131lmaz, Hasan Kamil, Anahatlar\u0131yla Tasavvuf ve Tar\u00eekatler, Ensar Ne\u015friyat, \u0130stanbul 2000.", "Zemah\u015fer\u00ee, (\u00f6. 538/1144), Ke\u015f\u015f\u00e2f, D\u00e2ru'l-k\u00fct\u00fcbi'l-\u0131lmiyye, Beyrut 2009.", "Zerke\u015f\u00ee, (\u00f6. 794/1392), el-Burh\u00e2n f\u00ee Ul\u00fbmi'l-Kur'\u00e2n, D\u00e2ru'l-fikr, Beyrut 2009."]}

Besmele, tefsîr ilminde en çok tartışılan konulardan biri olmuştur. Müfessirler, Neml sûre- sinde geçen besmelenin bir âyet olduğu konusunda hem fikir iken sûrelerin başında bulu- nan besmelelerin âyetten olup olmadığı konusunda ise ihtilâf halindedirler. Bu bağlamda müfessirlerin ihtilâfa düştüğü başka bir konu da Fâtiha'nın başında yer alan ilk besmele- nin diğerlerinden farklı olarak âyet sayılıp sayılmayacağı meselesidir. Her şeye rağmen bu besmeleye bir âyet gibi numara konulmuştur. Besmele ile Fâtiha'nın kendine has özel- likleri dikkate alınarak aralarındaki münâsebet bu çalışmada ele alınmaya çalışılmıştır. Aralarındaki münâsebet daha iyi anlaşılsın diye önce münâsebet ilmine değinilmiştir.Sonra makalenin konusu olan besmele ile Fâtiha arasındaki münâsebet işlenmiş, arala- rında nazım, fasıla, kelime ve mânâ ilişkilerinin olduğu ve Fâtiha'nın besmelenin bir açık- laması olduğu görülmüştür.The Relationship Between the Basmalah and al-FatihaThe Basmalah (In the name of God, All-Merciful, the All-Compassionate), has been one of the most widely debated issues in the science of exegesis. While commentators agree that the basmalah is a verse from the Qur'an, they are in disagreement on whether its appearance at the beginning of every chapter is an independent verse. Another issue of controversy among the commentators is whether the first Basmalah in the beginnig of al- Fatiha is a verse independent of all other basmalahs. In spite of this, the Basmalah at the beginning of Sura Fatiha has been given a number, indicating that it is a verse on its own. Taking into consideration its own unique features, the relationship between the Basmalah and the Opening Chapter (Al-Fatiha) has been considered in this study. To better understand the nature of the relationship between the two we first have adressed the science of Munasabah (The eligibility between verses and surah) and then examined into the nature of the relationship between the two in detail. It is concluded that the Opening Chapter can be considered as the expalanation of the Basmalah, as they are correlated with each other in terms of their repsective words and meanings.https://www.marife.org/marife/article/view/653

Atıf / Cite as: Kahraman, Ferruh. "Besmele ile Fâtiha Arasındaki Münâsebet". Marife 13/1 (2013): 53-66. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3344396.