Views provided by UsageCounts
{"references": ["Bay\u0131nd\u0131rl\u0131k ve \u0130sk\u00e2n Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131. (2008). Kentsel G\u00f6stergeler K\u0131lavuzu, Ankara.", "Connerly W. ve Marans, R.W. (1988). Neighborhood Quality: A Description and Analysis of Indicators, Handbook on Housing and the Built Environment. E. Hutteman ve W. van Vliet (Ed.), Westwood, CA: Greenwood Press.", "Ertan Akkoyunlu, K. ve Ertan, B. (2013). Kentli Haklar\u0131: Kent ve \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Ba\u011flam\u0131nda Kentsel Hizmetlere Eri\u015fim Hakk\u0131, Kentsel D\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm ve \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131. \u0130stanbul: \u0130stanbul Bilgi \u00dcniversitesi Yay\u0131nlar\u0131.", "European Commission and EUROSTAT. (2004). Urban Audit Methodological Handbook. Luxembourg.", "Geray, C. (1998). Kentsel Ya\u015fam Kalitesi ve Belediyeler, T\u00fcrk \u0130dare Dergisi, ss. 323- 345.", "Kalayc\u0131, \u015e. (2008). SPSS Uygulamal\u0131 \u00c7ok De\u011fi\u015fkenli \u0130statistik Teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yay\u0131n Da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m.", "Kavruk, H. (2002). Anaket'e Bak\u0131\u015f:T\u00fcrkiye'de Anakent Belediyecili\u011fi ve Kent Hizmetlerinin Y\u00f6netimi, Hizmet-i\u015f Sendikas\u0131.", "Lee, T. ve Marans, R.W. (1980). Objective and Subjective Indicators: Scale Di\u015fcordance on Interrelationships, Social Indicators Research Series 6, pp.47-64.", "Marans, R.W. ve Rodgers, W.L. (1975). Toward an Understanding of Community Satisfaction, Metropolitan America in Contemporary Perspective. A. Hawley ve V. Rock (Ed.), New York: Halsted Press.", "Marans, R.W. ve Cooper, M. (2000). Measuring the Quality of Community Life: A Program for Longitudinal and Comparative International Research. Singapore: Paper presented to the Second International Conference on Quality of Life in Cities.", "Marans, R. (2007). Kentsel Ya\u015fam Kalitesinin \u00d6l\u00e7\u00fclmesi, \u00e7ev. Handan D\u00fclker T\u00fcrko\u011flu, Mimarl\u0131k Dergisi, Say\u0131:335. http://www.mimarlikdergisi.com/index.cfm?sayfa=mimarlik&DergiSayi=53&RecID=1326&1534D83A_1933715A=75925ecdebffda9e6a3e309f425216fbc3b8dc41 Eri\u015fim Tarihi: 20.12.2018", "Massam, B.H. (2002). Quality of Life: Public Planning and Private Living, Progress in Planning, Vol. 58, pp.141-227.", "Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2015). How's Life in Turkey?, OECD Publishing.", "Peterson, P. J. (1997). Indicators of Sustainable Development in Industrializing Countries Volume 2 From Concepts to Action, LESTARI, Bangi.", "Tekeli, \u0130. (2010). G\u00fcndelik Ya\u015fam, Ya\u015fam Kalitesi ve Yerellik Yaz\u0131lar\u0131, Tarih Vakf\u0131 Yurt Yay\u0131nlar\u0131, \u0130stanbul, ss. 79-215.", "United Nations. (2004). Urban Indicators Guidelines: United Nations Human Settlement Programme, United Nations Publications, pp.1-60", "United Nations. (2009). Urban Indicators Guidelines: Better \u0130nformation, Better Cities, Monitoring the habitat Agenda and the Millenium Development Goals-Slums Target.", "Van Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer K., Marsman G. ve Hollander, A. (2003). Urban Environmental Quality And Human Well-Being: Towards A Conceptual Framework And Demarcation of Concepts: A Literature Study, Landscape and Urban Planning, No.65, pp.5-18.", "http://www.stat.gen.tr/index.php?istek=sinif&dersid=ist01&konuid=pca&max=1 Eri\u015fim Tarihi: 28.02.2019."]}
Kentler arasında artan rekabet, gelir ve refah düzeyindeki iyileşme kentlerde yaşayan bireylerin yaşam kalitesine ilişkin beklentilerinin artmasına neden olmuştur. Kentsel yaşam kalitesine ilişkin beklentilerin artması ise kentsel yaşanabilirliğe ilişkin politikaların önemini artırmıştır. Kentsel yaşam kalitesinin iyileştirilmesine yönelik politikaların etkin bir şekilde uygulanabilmesi için politika sonuçlarının izlenmesi ve sağlıklı bir izleme yapılabilmesi için de kentsel yaşam kalitesinin düzenli olarak ölçülmesi gereklidir. Uluslararası kuruluşlar kentsel yaşam kalitesinin ölçülmesine yönelik çalışmalarını uzun zamandır sürdürmekle birlikte Türkiye’nin bu çalışmalarda veri eksikliğinden dolayı yer alamadığı görülmektedir. Bu kapsamda uluslararası düzeyde kıyaslamalara imkân verecek şekilde Türkiye’de kentlerde yaşam kalitesinin ölçülmesine yönelik bir yaklaşımın geliştirilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı kentsel yaşam kalitesinin ölçülmesi, izlenmesi ve kentler arasında karşılaştırma yapılmasına yönelik bir yaklaşımın geliştirilmesine katkı sağlamaktır. Bu çerçevede, uluslararası kuruluşların kentsel yaşam kalitesi çalışmalarında kullandıkları göstergeler incelenmiş ve kentlerde sunulan hizmetler çerçevesinde bir gösterge listesi oluşturulmuştur. Kentsel yaşam kalitesinin farklı aktörlerce ölçülebilmesine yönelik kullanılabilecek üç yöntem değerlendirilerek avantajları ve dezavantajları ortaya konulmuştur. Increasing competition among cities and improvement in income and welfare raise the expectations of individuals living in cities for urban quality of life. Raising the expectations for urban quality of life grows in importance of urban livability policies, too. In order to implement policies effectively for enhancing urban quality of life, the policy outcomes should be monitored and in order to monitor the policy outcomes in a sound way, urban quality of life should be measured on a regular basis. Although international organizations have been carrying out research on measuring urban quality of life, the outlook of urban quality of life in Turkey is not available due to lack of data. Within this scope, an approach for measuring urban quality of life in Turkey should be developed, which enables international benchmarking. This paper aims to contribute the development of an approach for measuring urban quality of life and comparing urban quality of life among cities. In this context, the indicators used in urban quality of life researches carried out by international organizations were examined and an indicator list was compiled within the framework of the urban services. In this paper three methods that can be used to measure the urban quality of life by different actors have been examined and the advantages and disadvantages of these methods are presented.
Indicator, Gösterge, City, Urban Quality of Life, Kent, Kentsel Yaşam Kalitesi
Indicator, Gösterge, City, Urban Quality of Life, Kent, Kentsel Yaşam Kalitesi
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts