Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Presentation . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Presentation . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Clear and Consistent: Copyright Assessment Framework for Libraries

Authors: Saunderson, Fred; Tudur, Dafydd;

Clear and Consistent: Copyright Assessment Framework for Libraries

Abstract

Lengthy, complex terms of copyright protection and the constrained pace of copyright reform necessitate that libraries and collecting organisations increasingly look to practical methods for enabling mass digitisation of collections. Such methods may include licensing or orphan works clearance. In practice, however, proportionate acceptance of risk seems inescapable, especially when collections contain works that are not, or never have been, commercially available, or when institutions seek to digitise at scale. This paper presents the copyright assessment framework developed and adopted by the National Library of Scotland and the National Library of Wales. The framework is a pragmatic risk assessment and decision-making tool to aid the digitisation of collection material (Original Objects) and the making available of digitisations of collection material (Digital Surrogates). Using a number of assessment criteria, including publication status and commercial intent, the framework allows libraries logically and consistently to identify, record, and rationalise the relative risk of making Digital Surrogates available to the public and to make standardised copyright assessment decisions. The framework specifies suitable rights statements for assessed Digital Surrogates, using the standard statements published by Europeana and the Digital Public Library of America at RightsStatements.org. Functional across content types and at a high (eg collection) level, the framework is useful even when minimal copyright metadata is available, in particular when data related to authorial lifespan (often essential for determining the term of copyright protection) is missing or unknown. The schema is based in UK copyright law, although it can be adapted to comparable copyright systems, and works around a series of date ranges associated with an Original Object’s creation or publication, calculated in accordance with the methodology set out by Deazley and Padfield (Intellectual Property Office (2014). Consultation on reducing the duration of copyright in unpublished (“2039”) works in accordance with section 170(2) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. p.35). As a joint development, the framework is approved for use at the National Library of Wales and the National Library of Scotland, where it is integrated into the digitisation assessment workflow. The schema was developed by copyright and digital access specialists from the two organisations, grounded in established practice, and subject to peer review of experts from the UK cultural heritage and library sectors. This paper presents the framework, setting out its methods, benefits, and intended outcomes. The authors will invite other libraries to consider adopting the tool as a method of copyright due diligence, noting that wider adoption of an assessment standard strengthens its value for all users. The paper sets out the rationale behind the framework, while seeking feedback and suggestions to aid its ongoing improvement. The authors aim to encourage further application of the framework within the European library sector, as well as learn of complementary efforts so as to further the development of a standard structure for copyright assessment and decision-making.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 15
    download downloads 10
  • 15
    views
    10
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
15
10
Green