Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This survey was run at the University of Bordeaux in January 2019 using the questionnaire "Quantitative assessment of research data management practice" : Teperek, M., Krause, J., Lambeng, N., Blumer, E., van Dijck, J., Eggermont, R., … der Velden, Y. T. (2019). Quantitative assessment of research data management practice. Retrieved from : https://osf.io/mz3fx/ The questionnaire included all the primary and secondary common questions, institution-specific questions regarding services and file sharing (EPFL questions), institution-specific questions for profile information. Data from the 425 responses collected are published here. Details regarding data collection and curation are included in the README file.
RDM, Research Data Management, survey
RDM, Research Data Management, survey
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 10 | |
| downloads | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts