Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The methodological assessment of scenarios and models of biodiversity and ecosystem services carried out under the auspices of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) provides guidance for the use of scenarios and models for experts performing assessments within IPBES, as well as to scientists and other stakeholders and decision makers. Because the assessment focuses on methods, this report is more technical in nature than the thematic, regional and global assessments of IPBES. The assessment focuses on a critical analyses of the state-of-the-art and best practices for using scenarios and models in assessments and policy design and implementation relevant to biodiversity and ecosystem services. It proposes means for addressing gaps in data, knowledge, methods and tools relating to scenarios and models. It, finally, makes a series of recommendations for action by IPBES member States, stakeholders and the scientific community to implement and encourage those best practices in regard to the use of scenarios and models, engage in capacity-building and mobilize indigenous and local knowledge. The chapters of this assessment and their executive summaries, are available as document IPBES/4/INF/3/Rev.1. The present document is a summary for policymakers of the information presented in these chapters. It was approved by the 4th session of the Plenary of IPBES (22-28 February 2016, Kuala Lumpur).
Summary for Policymakers, IPBES, Scenarios and Models Assessment
Summary for Policymakers, IPBES, Scenarios and Models Assessment
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 469 | |
| downloads | 512 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts