Views provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.31032
This is a dataset collecting various tweets from twitter, sent to @rmounce that report on whether various institutional library affiliations allow the user to download the full text of this paywalled article, that is otherwise only accessible via a payment of $38 + tax: Hincks, W. D. 1949. IV.—systematic and synonymic notes on passalidæ (col.). Annals and Magazine of Natural History 2:56-64 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222934908653958 From the data given, it appears that 81 institutions do not have subscription access to this paper. 11 institutions do have subscription access to this paper. Of the data from 41 UK-based institutions, only 3 have subscription access to this paper, namely: Cambridge, Oxford & Glasgow. Many thanks to all those who took part in this survey and/or spread it around twitter. A blog post was written on the basis of this informal survey data: http://rossmounce.co.uk/2015/09/16/who-actually-has-access-to-paywalled-research/
access, institutions, equality, paywalls
Twitter Data
access, institutions, equality, paywalls
Twitter Data
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts