<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

D2.1: Artefact, Contributor, And Organisation Relationship Data Schema

Name: D2.1: Artefact, Contributor, And Organisation Relationship Data Schema
Keywords: doi, datacite, persistent identifier, pid, orcid

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Report , Other literature type , Article 01 Jan 2015Publisher:ZenodoFunded by:EC | THOR

Authors: Fenner, Martin; Demeranville, Tom; Kotarski, Rachael; Vision, Todd; Rueda, Laura; Dasler, Robin; Haak, Laure; +1 Authors

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.30799

D2.1: Artefact, Contributor, And Organisation Relationship Data Schema

- Summary
- Subjects
- Related research
  (2)
- Metrics

Abstract

This document identifies gaps in existing PID infrastructures, with a focus on ORCID and DataCite Metadata and links between contributors, organizations and artefacts. What prevents us from establishing interoperability and overcoming barriers between PID platforms for contributors, artefacts and organisations, and research solutions for federated attribution, claiming, publishing and direct data access? It goes on to propose strategies to overcome these gaps.

Related Organizations

British Library
United Kingdom
European Organization for Nuclear Research
Switzerland
DataCite
Germany

Keywords

doi, datacite, persistent identifier, pid, orcid

Filter by relation

All relations

arrow_drop_down

2 Research products, page 1 of 1

D2.1: Artefact, Contributor, And Organisation Relationship Data Schema - Appendix A
2015IsSupplementedBy
Technical and Human Infrastructure for Open Research (THOR)
2015IsPartOf

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	3
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average