Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This set of questions was developed with the conceptualized use case of going through each question for an already written draft paper to pay attention to the works cited (and edit appropriately as you determine necessary). The intention is to help you note patterns in terms of publication venues, diversity of sources, where the authors are from geographically, institutionally, intellectual genealogy, categories of race, gender, other intersectional categories. Note: I would not wish for this set of questions to be translated into a quantitative “rating” that gives a measure of progressive citational practices. Rather, I intend for these questions to help foster a reflective practice of focusing one’s own attention to important aspects that should be considered when writing and citing.
citational practice, self-review, Open Science,
citational practice, self-review, Open Science,
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 46 | |
| downloads | 21 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts