Views provided by UsageCounts
This is a machine learning project that aims at classifying the tweets as "sarcastic" or "non-sarcastic" using traditional machine learning methods. If you are interested in knowing more about the project, you can download the .zip folder given below. After extracting the folders from the .zip file, you will find the raw data in the folder Data/raw_data. The project is divided into two parts: Feature generation Model Building. Please execute the scripts in the following order: combine_datasets.py: this script will generate two datasets (sarcasm_data.txt, nonsarcasm_data.txt) data_cleaning.py: this script will perform the data cleaning and generate two files (sarcasm_clean.txt and nonsarcasm_clean.txt) to the /Data folder. generate_features.py: this script will generate lexical, pragmatic, and sentiment-based features from the tweets. classifiers.py: this file is located at /Model/classifiers.py. On executing this script, the models will be trained and tested and you will see a graph of evaluation metrics of all the models. To ensure the proper execution of the project, please make sure that you are executing this project using python 3.5 or above and you have all the required libraries installed.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts