Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Views of UK ammunition users about lead ammunition were statistically analysed using Q-methodology. Each participant was asked to rank, in order of agreement, 56 opinion statements about the topic. The dataset therefore includes information on: 1. The participant ID (all participants were anonymous) 2. The individual scores given to each statement by the participant, where -5 relates to statements most strongly disagreed with and +5 relates to statements most agreed with. There were a fixed number of statements along the scale. A pyramid shaped grip (know as an array) was used for the sorting exercise as it requires participants to rank statements in a forced quasi-normal distribution. See Figure S1 (Supplementary Materials).
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 4 | |
| downloads | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts