Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The aim of this competition is to evaluate the performance of state of the art methods for table detection (TRACK A) and table recognition (TRACK B). For the first track, document images containing one or several tables are provided. For TRACK B two subtracks exist: the first subtrack (B.1) provides the table region. Thus, only the table structure recognition must be performed. The second subtrack (B.2) provides no a-priori information. This means, the table region and table structure detection has to be done. The Ground Truth is provided in a similar format as for the ICDAR 2013 competition (see [2]): <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <document filename='filename.jpg'> <table id='Table_1540517170416_3'> <Coords points="180,160 4354,160 4354,3287 180,3287"/> <cell id='TableCell_1540517477147_58' start-row='0' start-col='0' end-row='1' end-col='2'> <Coords points="180,160 177,456 614,456 615,163"/> </cell> ... </table> ... </document> The difference to Gobel et al. [2] is the Coords tag which defines a table/cell as a polygon specified by a list of coordinates. For B.1 the table and its coordinates is given together with the input image. Important Note: For the modern dataset, the convex hull of the content describes a cell region. For the historical dataset, it is requested that the output region of a cell is the cell boundary. This is necessary due to the characteristics of handwritten text, which is often overlapping with different cells. See also: http://sac.founderit.com/tasks.html The evaluation tool is available at github: https://github.com/cndplab-founder/ctdar_measurement_tool
http://sac.founderit.com/
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 178 | |
| downloads | 105 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts