Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON WATER SORPTION AND SOLUBILITY OF THREE SOFT LINERS IN DIFFERENT SOLUTIONS: AN IN-VITRO STUDY.

Authors: Anagha Menon; Bhavana B.L; Rupesh P.L; Basavaraj S.Salagundi; Savitha K.C; Nithya. R. Krishnan.;

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON WATER SORPTION AND SOLUBILITY OF THREE SOFT LINERS IN DIFFERENT SOLUTIONS: AN IN-VITRO STUDY.

Abstract

Aim:Two silicone based soft denture lining materials (Mollosil, Molloplast-B), and an acrylic resin based soft denture liner (Viscogel) were selected for comparative evaluation of sorption and solubility in different solutions at different time intervals. Methodology: In this study two silicone based soft denture lining materials (Mollosil, Molloplast-B), and acrylic based soft denture liner (Viscogel) were selected for comparative evaluation of sorption and solubility in different solutions at different time intervals. 50 specimens for each material: Mollosil, Molloplast-B and Viscogel were prepared using brass dies of dimensions - 50mm diameter, 0.5mm thickness. The specimens were stored in different solutions (distilled water, denture cleanser and artificial saliva- acidic, basic, neutral), and tested after 1,4 and 16 weeks for sorption and solubility. Analysis of variance was used to find the significant differences between the materials at all time intervals. Result: The acrylic resin soft lining materials had higher solubility (3.920% Viscogel in acidic saliva) and absorption (3.138% Viscogel in distilled water) than Molloplast-B after 16 weeks of aging. Conclusion: The silicone based soft liner Mollosil, showed the highest percentage of sorption and solubility in artificial saliva than in distilled water, while an acrylic based Viscogel showed the highest percentage solubility in artificial saliva, and lowest percentage of sorption in distilled with the exception of Molloplast-B, which showed the highest percentage of solubility and sorption in distilled water, compared to all these soft lining materials.

Keywords

International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR)

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 17
    download downloads 6
  • 17
    views
    6
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
17
6
Green