Views provided by UsageCounts
Since their codification in 2016, the FAIR Data Principles have provided a framework and a banner around which those involved in scholarly communications have rallied to improve the state and status of non-article based research outputs. Yet, although this has led to new investments, products and services around FAIR, many stakeholders – both organisational and individual – are uncertain how to navigate effectively through the new requirements. This is especially critical for the ongoing tension between research outputs and the evaluation of both outputs and researchers themselves. This presentation clarifies key FAIR requirements as evidenced by work done to date. It also highlights ongoing challenges and posits next steps for reflection, implementation and further discussion.
FAIR Data, Open Science
FAIR Data, Open Science
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 6 |

Views provided by UsageCounts