Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2017
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2017
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2017
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Criterios para verificar y validar mecanismos en el desarrollo de videojuegos (Criteria for verifying and validating mechanisms in the development of videogames)

Authors: Andy Hernández P.; Karina Pérez T.;

Criterios para verificar y validar mecanismos en el desarrollo de videojuegos (Criteria for verifying and validating mechanisms in the development of videogames)

Abstract

En el proceso de desarrollo de software una de las disciplinas estándares es Requisitos. En la conceptualización de un producto software, la correcta definición de los requisitos es un aspecto crucial para determinar el alcance de un proyecto de este tipo. Esta correctitud puede generarse mediante la utilización en el proceso de criterios de verificación y validación de estos requisitos a diferentes niveles. La industria del software en los últimos años se ha visto altamente progresiva con el desarrollo de videojuegos serios, que representan productos educativos y funcionan como herramientas de apoyo para el tratamiento de personas con limitaciones físicas. Un videojuego está compuesto por mecanismos lógicos a diferentes niveles y que representan, en otro dominio de aplicación, a los requisitos funcionales. En un videojuego un mecanismo constituye un conjunto de elementos interactivos que poseen un propósito u objetivo común para un jugador. En el Centro de Entornos Interactivos 3D, Vertex, de la Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas el desarrollo de videojuegos serios constituye una línea de desarrollo. Los mecanismos que son especificados para cualquier producto de esta línea no se guían por un sistema de criterios que permitan su verificación y validación. El objetivo de esta investigación es definir una estrategia compuesta por un sistema de criterios para verificar y validar los mecanismos que serán implementados en videojuegos serios.

Revista Antioqueña de las Ciencias Computacionales y la Ingeniería de Software RACCIS, 7(1), 7-12.

Keywords

Validación, Criterios, Mecanismos, Verificación

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 36
    download downloads 20
  • 36
    views
    20
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
36
20
Green