Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ACCURACY OF BIOMETRIC FORMULAS OBTAINED BY APPLANATION A-SCAN BIOMETRY.

Authors: V A N P Kumari Oruganti; K. Venkateswarlu; Kaavyahanuraj Kolalapudi; P.Shyam Sundar.;

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ACCURACY OF BIOMETRIC FORMULAS OBTAINED BY APPLANATION A-SCAN BIOMETRY.

Abstract

Aim of the study: To evaluate and compare the accuracy of different intra ocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for predicting post operative refraction in eyes of different axial lengths using applanation A scan biometry Methods: In prospective study, conducted in GREH, Visakhapatnam with 50 eyes.Axial lengths were calculated by applanation A-scan biometry. All eyes were divided into three groups according to AL: short (<22.0 mm), average (22.0?25.0 mm), and long (>25.0 mm) eyes. IOL power calculation was done using the five Formulas SRKII, SRK/T, HOLLADAY 1, HOFFERQ, and BINKHORST 2. All patients were subjected to SICS with PCIOL implantation under local anaesthetia.The implanted power of IOL was based on SRK II formula. Final refraction was measured 6 weeks postoperatively.Post-operative spherical equivalent (SE) was calculated and compared with predicted refractive error using each biometric formula. Results: All formulas had a significantly lower MAE in comparison with BINKHORST II formula. SRK II and SRK/T had lowest MAE (0.58?0.44) for all eyes. SRK II had the lowest MAE for average (0.54?0.40) and short (0.67?0.54)eyes.SRK/T had the lowest MAE (0.63?0.48) for long eyes. BINKHORST II formula had highest MAE for all (0.69?0.48) and average (0.68?0.46) eyes. HOFFER Q formula had highest MAE (0.76?0.65) for short eyes and SRK II had highest MAE (0.89?0.64) for long eyes Conclusion:SRK II and SRK/T are accurate formulas for average eyes.SRK II and HOLLADAY I are best formula of choice in short eyes.SRK/Tis accurate IOL formula for long eyes followed by HOLLADAY I and HOFFER Q .

Keywords

International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR)

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
    download downloads 7
  • 3
    views
    7
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
7
Green