Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This is the presentation slide deck for the keynote at OpenCon Cascadia, Feb. 1-2 2019 In this talk, I argue that scholarly communication and scientific knowledge production should be seen as a complex system of power that favours privileged institutions and individuals, and marginalize and even oppress those who do not conform to the norms and “standards” established by the powerful. The result is a deeply entrenched epistemological hierarchy. Openness alone cannot “transform” this complex as this interlocking system of institutions and technology are deeply rooted in past political and ideological structures. They have become invisible infrastructure and seldom questioned. To begin to disrupt this system, we need to go beyond challenging the visible barriers of the system, notably paywall and licensing issues, to question the hidden and invisible power that sustains and replicate power and privilege. To this end, we need to rethink what constitutes infrastructure, who has the power to build and govern them, what informs its design, who are subjected to its “governance”, and the consequences for the powerless. In particular, I wish to focus on infrastructure as forms of invisible power. I will provide examples to demonstrate that simply imposing “open” on closed infrastructures serve to replicate existing power inequality and epistemic injustice. Openness, when decontextualized from its historical and political roots, could become as exploitative and oppressive as the legacy system it seeks to displace.
inclusive infrastructure, power analysis, open science, open access, governance, epistemic justice
inclusive infrastructure, power analysis, open science, open access, governance, epistemic justice
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 7 | |
| downloads | 6 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts