Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Over the last couple of years, CESSDA has built-up and improved a comprehensive infrastructure that provides a development and test environment available to all CESSDA Service Providers – at least those who develop software for CESSDA. This environment makes use of modern technologies such as Bitbucket, Jenkins, Selenium, and SonarQube. To enhance the reproducibility, reliability, and scalability of the components that form part of the CESSDA tools and services portfolio, it also uses containerisation (Docker) and clustering (Kubernetes). However, having a powerful development and deployment infrastructure for the CESSDA Service Provider community is not enough. It is also important to ensure that all developers that contribute software are developing it in a consistent and reusable way and are aware of what is expected of them. The latest version of the CESSDA Software Maturity Levels document sets quality standards across twelve criteria and is used to determine whether or not contributed software is of a standard to be accepted and deployed.
Quality, Software
Quality, Software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 34 | |
| downloads | 24 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts