Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Chromium Conversations

Authors: Benjamin S. Meyers; Nuthan Munaiah; Emily Prud'hommeaux; Andrew Meneely; Cecilia O. Alm; Josephine Wolff; Pradeep K. Murukannaiah;

Chromium Conversations

Abstract

This dataset was released as part of the following publication. Benjamin S. Meyers, Nuthan Munaiah, Emily Prud'hommeaux, Andrew Meneely, Cecilia O. Alm, Josephine Wolff, and Pradeep Murukannaiah. A Dataset for Identifying Actionable Feedback in Collaborative Software Development. Proceedings of the 2018 Meeting for the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). Melbourne, Australia. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P18-2021 Files: chromium_conversations.csv This is the full dataset containing over 1.5 million comments posted by developers reviewing proposed code changes. The dataset also includes the values we calculated for all nine linguistic features (described in Section 4 of the paper cited above). chromium_conversations_annotations.csv This dataset is a subset of the chromium_conversations.csv dataset. It contains the data used in the classification experiment outlined in Section 5 of the paper cited above (2,994 comments automatically identified as acted-upon and 800 comments manually identified as not (known-to-be) acted-upon). CSV Fields: Organizational: review_id: Unique identifier of a code review in the Chromium project. The URL https://codereview.chromium.org/<review_id> may be used to access the review online patchset_id: Unique identifier of a code review patchset (i.e., collection of changes to the source code) associated with a review patch_id: Unique identifier of a code review patch (i.e., individual change to the source code) associated with a patchset file_path: The path to the file being modified in the patch line_number: The line number in the file at which the comment was posted posted_timestamp: The timestamp indicating when the comment was posted author_email: The (de-identified) author of the comment author_type: The role of the author (i.e., reviewer or developer) Natural Language: text: The raw natural language text of the code review comment Linguistic Metrics: yngve: The maximum Yngve score of sentences in the code review comment frazier: The maximum Frazier score of sentences in the code review comment pdensity: The Propositional Density score of the code review comment cdensity: The Content Density score of the code review comment pct_neg_tokens: Ratio (percentage) of total number of tokens in negative sentences to the total number of tokens in all sentences in the code review comment pct_neu_tokens: Ratio (percentage) of total number of tokens in neutral sentences to the total number of tokens in all sentences in the code review comment pct_pos_tokens: Ratio (percentage) of total number of tokens in positive sentences to the total number of tokens in all sentences in the code review comment pct_nne_tokens: Ratio (percentage) of total number of tokens in non-neutral sentences to the total number of tokens in all sentences in the code review comment min_politeness: Minimum of the politeness of sentences in the code review comment max_politeness: Maximum of the politeness of sentences in the code review comment min_formality: Minimum of the formality of sentences in the code review comment max_formality: Maximum of the formality of sentences in the code review comment num_tokens: Total number of tokens in the code review comment num_sentences: Total number of sentences in the code review comment has_doxastic: Binary indicator of presence of a sentence with doxastic uncertainty in the code review comment has_epistemic: Binary indicator of presence of a sentence with epistemic uncertainty in the code review comment has_conditional: Binary indicator of presence of a sentence with conditional uncertainty in the code review comment has_investigative: Binary indicator of presence of a sentence with investigative uncertainty in the code review comment has_uncertainty: Binary indicator of presence of a sentence with any uncertainty in the code review comment Classification: comment_type: Manual annotation of the type of code review comment between acted-upon and not (known to be) acted-upon

Whenever possible, we would appreciate it if you cite both the paper that released this work and the DOI for this dataset. Thank you!

Related Organizations
Keywords

Chromium, Software Engineering, NLP, Natural Language, Natural Language Processing, Feedback

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 45
    download downloads 19
  • 45
    views
    19
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
45
19
Related to Research communities