Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10044/1/68116
Statistical data for the 3D Taylor Green flow from Re=1250 to Re=20000 obtained with the flow solver Incompact3d. # =========================================================================================== # When publishing results using this data, the following paper should be cited as the source: # Thibault Dairay, Eric Lamballais, Sylvain Laizet and John Christos Vassilicos # Numerical dissipation vs. subgrid-scale modelling for large eddy simulation # Journal of Computational Physics 337 (2017) 252–274 # https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2017.02.035 # =========================================================================================== # Column 1 : time t # Column 2 : kinetic energy E_k [=(u^2+v^2+w^2)/2] # Column 3 : dissipation epsilon_t [=-dE_k/dt] # Column 4 : dissipation epsilon [= nu ((du/dx)^2+(du/dy)^2+(du/dz)^2+(dv/dx)^2+(dv/dy)^2+(dv/dz)^2+(dw/dx)^2+(dw/dy)^2+ dw/dz)^2)] # Column 5 : enstrophy Dzeta [=2 nu epsilon] # Column 6 : mean square u^2 # Column 7 : mean square v^2 # Column 8 : mean square w^2 # Column 9 : mean square (du/dx)^2 # Column 10 : mean square (du/dy)^2 # Column 11 : mean square (du/dz)^2 # Column 12 : mean square (dv/dx)^2 # Column 13 : mean square (dv/dy)^2 # Column 14 : mean square (dv/dz)^2 # Column 15 : mean square (dw/dx)^2 # Column 16 : mean square (dw/dy)^2 # Column 17 : mean square (dw/dz)^2
{"references": ["Dairay, T., Lamballais, E., Laizet, S., & Vassilicos, J. C. (2017). Numerical dissipation vs. subgrid-scale modelling for large eddy simulation. Journal of Computational Physics, 337, 252-274.", "Laizet, S., & Lamballais, E. (2009). High-order compact schemes for incompressible flows: A simple and efficient method with quasi-spectral accuracy. Journal of Computational Physics, 228(16), 5989-6015."]}
Direct Numerical Simulation, Incompact3d, 3D Taylor-Green vortex, 510
Direct Numerical Simulation, Incompact3d, 3D Taylor-Green vortex, 510
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 85 | |
| downloads | 29 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts