A Case for Open Science Hardware

{"references": ["Maia Chagas A (2018) Haves and have nots must find a better way: The case for open scientific hardware. PLoS Biol 16(9): e3000014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000014", "Maia Chagas A, Prieto-Godino LL, Arrenberg AB, Baden T (2017) The \u20ac100 lab: A 3D-printable open-source platform for fluorescence microscopy, optogenetics, and accurate temperature control during behaviour of zebrafish, Drosophila, and Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Biol 15(7): e2002702. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2002702", "Kutschera, A. & Lamb, J.J. Curr Microbiol (2018) 75: 231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-017-1370-3"]}

Presentation about Open Science Hardware held at the Berlin Open Science - Reproducible Research - Meetup on Feb 06, 2019.

Related Organizations

Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research and Education
Indonesia

Keywords

Open Source Hardware, Open Science Hardware

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average