Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Traditionally used metallic implants for fracture stabilisation even though have potential capability for fracture healing have been associated with significant disadvantages like patient incompliance and implant loosening leading to mal union, non-union and dis-union. Veterinary orthopaedics during the last decade has visualised a significant development with respect to use of biomaterials particularly in the field of fracture treatment and stabilisation. A large variety of biomaterials are available in the form of bone grafts and bone substitutes for commercial use to treat significant bone defects due to trauma and to enhance the rate of fracture healing. The present article aims to give an insight into the various bone grafts and bone substitutes available, their potential uses, applications, advantages and limitations in veterinary field.
Fracture Canine Biomaterials Grafts.
Fracture Canine Biomaterials Grafts.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 17 | |
| downloads | 8 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts