Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The heydays of XML have come to a close, and XML finds itself confronted with competitors that represent—in some respects—steps backwards. In this paper we argue that at this point it is of particular importance to study the history of markup in order to avoid reinventing the wheel, but also to reflect on and possibly re-evaluate design choices in order to advance the state of the art. Slides for the talk at XML Prague 2019. The paper is published in the proceedings of XML Prague 2019, which are available in various formats from XML Prague Archive, as is a recording of the talk.
{"references": ["http://archive.xmlprague.cz/2019/files/xmlprague-2019-proceedings.pdf#page=335"]}
markup, SGML, history, XML, SGML; XML; markup; history
markup, SGML, history, XML, SGML; XML; markup; history
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 19 | |
| downloads | 13 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts