Downloads provided by UsageCounts
{"references": ["ACRL (2015). R\u00e9f\u00e9rentiel de comp\u00e9tences informationnelles en enseignement sup\u00e9rieur. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/standards/framework-french.pdf", "Akkari, A. (2016). Introduction aux approches interculturelles en \u00e9ducation (3e \u00e9d.). Gen\u00e8ve : Universit\u00e9 de Gen\u00e8ve.", "Bertrand, Y. (1998). Th\u00e9ories contemporaines de l'\u00e9ducation. Montr\u00e9al : \u00c9ditions NOUVELLES", "Damant, Paquet et B\u00e9langer. (2001) Recension critique des \u00e9crits sur l'empowerment ou quand l'exp\u00e9rience de femmes victimes de violence conjugale fertilise des constructions conceptuelles. Recherches f\u00e9ministes, 142, 133-154.", "Shen, C., & Bj\u00f6rk, B. C. (2015). 'Predatory'open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.\u00a0BMC medicine,\u00a013(1), 230-245. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2", "Bell, K. (2017). 'Predatory'open access journals as parody: Exposing the limitations of 'legitimate'academic publishing. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 15(2), 651-662. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v15i2.870", "Berger, M. et Cirasella, J. (2015). Beyond Beall's List: Better Understanding Predatory Publishers. College & Research Libraries News. 76 (3): 132\u2013135. https://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/article/view/9277/10342", "Bohannon, J. (2016). Who's downloading pirated papers? Everyone. Science, 352(6285), 508-512. doi:10.1126/science.352.6285.508", "Lawson, S. (2017). Access, ethics and piracy.\u00a0Insights,\u00a030(1), 25-29. http://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.333", "Smith, R. (2015, 28 mai). The peer review drugs don't work. Times Higher Education.", "Shneiderman. B. (2003, 27 mai). A short history of structured flowcharts (Nassi-Shneiderman Diagrams). R\u00e9cup\u00e9r\u00e9 de http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/members/bshneiderman/nsd/index.html", "Contributeurs Wikip\u00e9dia. (2017). Contenus de qualit\u00e9. Dans Wikip\u00e9dia, l'encyclop\u00e9die libre. R\u00e9cup\u00e9r\u00e9 de https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Contenus_de_qualit%C3%A9", "Contributeurs Wikip\u00e9dia. (2017). Wikipedia : Wikiprojects, and assessments of articles' importance and quality. Dans Wikip\u00e9dia, l'encyclop\u00e9die libre. R\u00e9cup\u00e9r\u00e9 de https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia#Coverage_of_topics_and_systemic_bias", "Contributeurs Wikipedia. (2017). Coverage of topics and systemic bias. Dans Wikip\u00e9dia, l'encyclop\u00e9die libre. R\u00e9cup\u00e9r\u00e9 de https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia#Coverage_of_topics_and_systemic_bias", "Contributeurs Wikip\u00e9dia. (2017). Wikipedia:Edits by project and country of origin. Dans Wikip\u00e9dia, l'encyclop\u00e9die libre. R\u00e9cup\u00e9r\u00e9 de https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edits_by_project_and_country_of_origin", "Wikipedia pageviews, percentage to language. R\u00e9cup\u00e9r\u00e9 de https://stats.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/animations/wivivi/wivivi.html"]}
La refonte de deux cours sur les compétences informationnelles donnés dans un pays du sud sert de plateforme pour réfléchir à l’apport de la pédagogie critique et de l’éducation interculturelle dans les pratiques d’enseignement en contexte nord-américain.
compétences informationnelles, pédagogie critique
compétences informationnelles, pédagogie critique
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 8 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts