Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Interdisciplinary research receives increasing attention from academics, research organizations, and funding bodies. It is seen as a promising avenue to develop novel insights. However, it is also considered to be more complicated to set up and to conduct successfully. To make the scattered literature on the subject accessible and to derive implications for both individual researchers and policy makers, we propose that interdisciplinary research can be conceptualized as a set of five dilemmas. Based on an extensive and systematic literature review of 137 research articles we present these dilemmas to better structure the main promises and pitfalls of interdisciplinary research. The value of conceptualizing interdisciplinary research this way is three-fold: (1) it makes existing research on the topic accessible as it structures the highly dispersed debates, (2) it provides implications for individual researchers active in an increasingly interdisciplinary academic environment, and (3) it supports research organizations and funding bodies in developing strategies to support an interdisciplinary research ecosystem. We also present a data preprocessing, exploration, and analysis framework in later sections of the report. This technical framework is aimed at accelerating studies of interdisciplinarity (and for testing our framework in follow-up studies) by streamlining common tasks such as data cleaning and enrichment, and automatic detection of interdisciplinary bodies of work in large bibliometric databases.
systematic review, interdisciplinary research, linked data, scientometrics
systematic review, interdisciplinary research, linked data, scientometrics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 7 | |
| downloads | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts