Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

The Self Is Never Free

Authors: Washburn, Jonathan;

The Self Is Never Free

Abstract

What distinguishes a process that tracks its activity from one that holds its own activity as a whole? Recognition Science represents each event as a comparison and adopts its second aspect as the experiential reading. A complete experience spans an eight-step cycle and contains its total activity at least once. Acquisition followed by replay makes the total available for comparison. Tracking each step can have zero mismatch cost. Holding the whole against one step always costs something. We derive the exact minimum, show how it depends on the distribution of activity, and calculate the additional price of holding a record of experience. Conscious degree and temporal content can change independently. Controlled network responses and recovery curves supply quantitative tests of the cost model; phase-preserving measurements distinguish lost activity from activity erased by averaging. Applying these results to a physical subject requires identifying its cycle, comparisons, and realized experience stream.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback