Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Recognition Language Series: Loom, Clock, Vocabulary and Alphabet

Authors: Washburn;

Recognition Language Series: Loom, Clock, Vocabulary and Alphabet

Abstract

These seven papers are one program. A recognition event is a closed walk on a small cube, and the series asks what such walks can be made to say. The answer climbs a ladder: repeated distinction generates the numbers; instruments that only add are deaf to the order of events; bookkeeping forces what each act writes; the closed walks of one window form a finite alphabet; that alphabet supports a real language; the meanings of that language live in a forced geometry; and that geometry's canonical vocabulary is provably incomplete, so context is a theorem rather than a habit. Each paper proves one rung and hands the next its premises. Read this page first; it tells you what each paper establishes in plain words and where the easiest door into each one is.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback