Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

A Three-Layer Obstruction for Uniformly Popular Differences

Authors: Anonymous;

A Three-Layer Obstruction for Uniformly Popular Differences

Abstract

Anonymous unrefereed candidate. This release gives an explicit counterexample in Z/21Z to the strict one-third question in AIM Problem 1.18, an elementary three-layer family, and odd-cyclic counterexamples for every fixed threshold below 2/5.Producer-side normal and optimized Python replay, a separate JavaScript implementation, four semantic mutation controls, fresh-extraction checks, and internal editorial review pass. Novelty remains only partially assessed. Independent reproduction, formal verification, external specialist review, editorial peer review, and priority are not established. No claim is made that 2/5 is sufficient or sharp or that the C21 witness is minimal.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback