Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Journal . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Journal . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

Self-Healing CI/CD Pipelines Using AI Agents: An Autonomous Failure Detection and Recovery

Authors: Sujata B. Patil, Mantasha Khan, Sachin Y. Zurange, Khilesh Chaudhari & Kishor Markade;

Self-Healing CI/CD Pipelines Using AI Agents: An Autonomous Failure Detection and Recovery

Abstract

Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipelines represent the operational backbone of modern software delivery. Despite their critical role, these pipelines remain susceptible to a broad class of runtime failures — ranging from unresolved dependency conflicts to misconfigured environment variables — that demand significant manual intervention and introduce measurable delivery latency. This paper presents SHIELD (Self-Healing Intelligent Engine for Log-Driven pipelines), a novel AI-agent-based framework designed to autonomously detect, diagnose, and remediate pipeline failures without human involvement. SHIELD integrates a multi-layer monitoring architecture with a hybrid reasoning engine that combines deterministic pattern matching with large language model (LLM)-driven root cause inference. Empirical evaluation across five controlled failure scenarios demonstrates a mean time-to-recovery (MTTR) reduction of 74.3% and a first-attempt autonomous fix success rate of 82.6% compared to manual debugging baselines. The framework is implemented atop GitHub Actions and Jenkins with Docker-based execution environments, and is designed as a plug-and-play module requiring no modifications to existing pipeline definitions. These results suggest that AI-augmented self-healing is a tractable and practically deployable strategy for improving DevOps reliability at scale.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!