
This policy report addresses federal hemp protections, medical-cannabis access for veterans, cannabinoid research, and the need for coordinated physician-guided care. It combines a patient-centered policy argument with longitudinal clinical documentation, historical public advocacy, international agricultural and herbal knowledge, disability-related functional evidence, and original scholarship concerning cannabinoid use and psychoaffective outcomes. The report distinguishes nonintoxicating CBD use from THC-related clinical and regulatory questions and argues that patient testimony should inform, but not replace, rigorous scientific research. It requests support for immediate federal protections preventing disruption of lawful hemp access and for legislation permitting Department of Veterans Affairs physicians to recommend medical cannabis where state law allows. Supporting exhibits document four VA medical records across three specialties describing CBD use or reported functional benefit, a long-standing therapeutic and policy relationship involving Jamaican herbalist and certified commercial organic farmer Collin Artwell, historical medical-marijuana advocacy, and two related scholarly publications archived through Zenodo.
bipolar disorder, Jamaica, cannabinoid research, public policy, medical cannabis, patient advocacy, Rastafari, artificial intelligence, healthcare access, medical marijuana, community development, cannabidiol, disability, Department of Veterans Affairs, CBD, veterans, conflict resolution, chronic pain, hemp policy, longitudinal case documentation
bipolar disorder, Jamaica, cannabinoid research, public policy, medical cannabis, patient advocacy, Rastafari, artificial intelligence, healthcare access, medical marijuana, community development, cannabidiol, disability, Department of Veterans Affairs, CBD, veterans, conflict resolution, chronic pain, hemp policy, longitudinal case documentation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
