Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

Renal Carcinoma Therapeutics: ccRCC Vs nccRCC, An Unclear And Uneven Struggle to Include Everyone

Authors: Folinas Konstantinos; Apostolopoulou Valentina; Bartzi Dimitra;

Renal Carcinoma Therapeutics: ccRCC Vs nccRCC, An Unclear And Uneven Struggle to Include Everyone

Abstract

Abstract Renal carcinoma (RCC) accounts for roughly 2% of global cancer diagnoses, with over 430,000 new cases and 150,000+ deaths annually as of 2022. Major contributors include obesity, smoking, hypertension, and occupational exposure, with up to 34% of cases considered preventable. RCC is a malignant neoplasm of the renal tubular epithelium, primarily classified into three main histological subtypes: clear cell (65–75%), papillary (10–15%), and chromophobe (5%) and other histologies, most commonly categorized as clear cell RCC (ccRCC) and non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC), respectively. nccRCC is a heterogeneous group comprising about 20–30% of all kidney cancers, with over 10 recognized, distinct histological subtypes rather than a single type. The therapeutic algorithm for ccRCC is straightforward according to guidelines of every oncologic society even if the use of certain biomarkers in order for certain therapy module to be matched with certain subpopulations. In contrast, the therapeutic algorithm of nccRCC is not such a solid pathway that includes also the possibility of a clinical trial. There have been many advancements in the last year into renal cell carcinoma management that may alter the current status and improve the survival of these patients.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!