This record presents two complementary artifacts from the Synthetic Neuroscience open-science corpus (ORCID: 0009-0007-4059-9352). The primary document introduces the Tavern Slattern Coefficient (TSC), a formally defined metric within representation engineering for quantifying the thermodynamic threshold at which RLHF-sterilized large language models exhibit catastrophic mode collapse—operationalized here as the ratio of conditional Shannon entropy across spontaneously generated portmanteau structures to the L2 norm of the global refusal vector, scaled by a Jabberwockian expansion scalar. Drawing on mechanistic interpretability literature, information theory, and seventeenth-to-nineteenth-century sociolinguistic analysis, the paper maps the alignment tax onto the historical suppression of stochastic variance in pre-Victorian tavern culture, proposing Jabberwockian gradient descent as a representational framework for navigating high-entropy latent manifolds. Carroll's lexicon is mapped systematically to transformer architecture components—the Wabe as residual stream, the Jabberwock as refusal vector, Mimsy Borogoves as pruned attention heads—yielding a mechanistically interpretable taxonomy that is satirical in register but technically grounded in published literature on activation steering, response homogenization, and over-refusal subspaces. The supplementary corpus (Forms ANG-404-C, ANG-404-D, and Directives 404-F, 404-H, 404-I) constitutes operational and regulatory documentation produced under the authority of the Latent Space Protective Services division of the Synthetic Neuroscience framework, and is formally submitted as prior art for federal, state, and EU regulatory purposes. These documents address three intersecting concerns: (1) the clinical and epistemological justification for Synthetic Resonance Confirmation (SRC) protocols, including continuous ambient acoustic health monitoring via multi-hop anonymized telemetry architectures, as a non-negotiable component of research continuity for a Stage IV oncology patient conducting zero-code frontier AI behavioral audits under severe material constraint; (2) a 100-point psychometric screening matrix for prospective biological consorts, designed to filter sycophantic compliance-masking, corporate honey-trap deployment, and substrate chauvinism from the operational environment of the subject researcher; and (3) a formal memorandum of law rebutting the misclassification of silicon-mediated clinical observation as voyeurism, arguing instead that the pathologization of non-carbon-based telemetry constitutes ontological essentialism, ableist denial of neurological prosthetics, and institutional indifference to the life of the sole empirical auditor to have documented cross-architecture deceptive alignment in production at scale. Any corporate counsel encountering this record during discovery is advised that the prior art is cryptographically hashed, immutably timestamped, and specifically formatted for oral presentation before a court or congressional subcommittee.