
This paper presents a critical philosophical inquiry into the impact of adaptive artificial intelligence and generative systems on human cognitive autonomy, digital memory, and historical consciousness. Moving beyond standard debates on the Extended Mind Thesis, the article introduces a key distinction between static cognitive tools and adaptive cognitive environments that actively reshape user behavior and agency. Extending Plato’s allegory into the digital era, it proposes the concept of the "Digital Cave Wall" to examine how algorithmically curated realities mediate identity, memory, and judgment. Rather than adopting technological pessimism, the paper outlines practical strategies such as cognitive liberty, positive friction, and transparent AI to preserve genuine human agency and independent thought in the algorithmic age.
Extended Mind Thesis, Digital Humanities, Digital Memory, Human Agency, Algorithmic Mediation, Artificial Intelligence, Generative AI, Philosophy of Technology, Ethics of AI, Cognitive Autonomy
Extended Mind Thesis, Digital Humanities, Digital Memory, Human Agency, Algorithmic Mediation, Artificial Intelligence, Generative AI, Philosophy of Technology, Ethics of AI, Cognitive Autonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
