
This framework defines the minimum set of governance, engineering and evidentiary requirements that an organisation shall satisfy in order to deploy, operate, study or rely on artificial intelligence systems in a manner that is accountable, auditable and defensible. The central premise is unchanged from the framework it supersedes. Artificial intelligence systems are not autonomous decision makers. They are a supervised, constrained and auditable processing layer that accelerates human cognitive work without substituting human accountability. To that premise this edition adds a second one, which governs everything in the evidence domain. A statement produced by, or about, an artificial intelligence system is not established because the system produced it, because a metric improved, or because a demonstration was persuasive. It is established when a documented procedure exists under which the statement could have failed and did not.
Governance, AI act, Artificial Intelligence, AI governance
Governance, AI act, Artificial Intelligence, AI governance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
