
An explicit four-term counterexample to the Special Image Conjecture in three contraction pairs, obtained by a one-pair bihomogeneous lift of Christopher D. Long's SU(2) Mathieu counterexample. For f=tau(t-y)(wz+vt) and g=y, the paper proves E(f^m)=0 and [t]E(g f^m)=(-1)^(m-1)(m+1)!m! for every m>=1. Thus the minimum possible failure dimension is two or three.
Mathieu subspace, SU(2), Gaussian moments, image conjecture, special image conjecture, polynomial contraction, xz-Conjecture
Mathieu subspace, SU(2), Gaussian moments, image conjecture, special image conjecture, polynomial contraction, xz-Conjecture
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
