Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

DIFFERENCES IN MORPHOMETRIC PARAMETERS ACROSS THE VARIOUS SEGMENTS OF THE CROSS RIVER BASIN

Authors: ABRAHAM, Comfort Monday; EBUKANSON, Ekong Sunday; TOM, Akan Abel;

DIFFERENCES IN MORPHOMETRIC PARAMETERS ACROSS THE VARIOUS SEGMENTS OF THE CROSS RIVER BASIN

Abstract

Although a drainage basin is often described by a single set of whole-basin parameters, its component segments, or sub-basins, can differ substantially in morphometric character, with direct consequences for how hydrologic hazard is distributed across the catchment. This study examines the differences in morphometric parameters across the seventeen third-order sub-basins, or segments, of the Cross River Basin (CRB), a transboundary catchment of approximately 51,892 km² in southeastern Nigeria and western Cameroon. Descriptive variability statistics (mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation) and paired t-tests were applied to linear and areal parameters extracted from a 2020 ASTER Digital Elevation Model. Results show that the seventeen segments differ most sharply in size-related parameters, with basin area exhibiting a coefficient of variation (CV) of 53.6%, total stream length 49.2%, and number of streams 48.5%, the largest segment (4,769.49 km²) exceeding the smallest (826.94 km²) by a factor of nearly six. Shape-related parameters occupy an intermediate position (CV between 19% and 36%), while drainage density (CV = 11.4%) and length of overland flow (CV = 10.7%) are comparatively uniform across segments. A paired t-test comparing first-order and second-order mean stream length across the seventeen segments returned statistically significant difference (t = 3.66, p = 0.002), while a paired t-test comparing first-to-second-order and second-to-third-order bifurcation ratios did not reach significance (t = 1.69, p = 0.111). On the strength of this evidence, the null hypothesis of no significant difference in the morphometric parameters of the Cross River Basin's segments is rejected. The findings demonstrate that the CRB is morphometrically heterogeneous at the sub-basin scale, most markedly in size and network complexity and least markedly in drainage density, a pattern with direct implications for how the basin's hydrologic response and flood risk should be assessed and managed on a segment-by-segment rather than whole-basin basis.

Keywords

Keywords: sub-basin differences; coefficient of variation; paired t-test; morphometric variability; Cross River Basin; segment analysis

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!