
Milenascopia bilineata Queiroz & Rafael, 2019 Figs. 60A–B Examined material. Holotype ♂: BRASIL, Amazonas, Iranduba, Sítio Santa Maria, 03º06'S / 60º19'W, 21.xi.2015, Coleta manual de casal em cópula em arbusto no período da noite, D. G. Pádua leg.” “ Milenascopia bilineata Queiroz & Rafael, 2019 ” (INPA) Other material: Same location as holotype but 21.xi.2015 (1♀ INPA); 20.xi.2018 (5♂ 1♀ INPA) Diagnosis. Transverse sclerite arched, with anterior margin concave, posterior convex, with minute projections. Branch of lophi widened. Hook of lophi in dorsal view rounded, shortened. Ectophallic valves projected posteriorly. Description. This species is well described in Queiroz & Rafael (2019). Comments. This species can be separated from all other cogeneric by the projected ectophallic valves, except for Milenascopia robusta comb. nov., which also has this character. From this latter species, Milenascopia bilineata can be differentiated by the shape of the transverse sclerite, which is arched in Milenascopia bilineata and rectangular, with all margins straight in Milenascopia robusta comb. nov. Geographical records. BRAZIL, Amazonas, Iranduba (Fig. 55).
Published as part of Queiroz, Larissa Lima De, Rafael, José Albertino & Heleodoro, Raphael Aquino, 2026, Systematics of Proscopiini Serville, 1838 (Orthoptera: Proscopiidae: Proscopiinae), with description of four new genera, pp. 1-141 in Zootaxa 5855 (1) on page 83, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5855.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/21565456
Proscopiidae, Insecta, Arthropoda, Milenascopia, Animalia, Orthoptera, Biodiversity, Milenascopia bilineata, Taxonomy
Proscopiidae, Insecta, Arthropoda, Milenascopia, Animalia, Orthoptera, Biodiversity, Milenascopia bilineata, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
