Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

The Dark-Light Reflection: Deconstructing Kwaku Ananse's Gourd and Okonore Yaa's Hearthstone. (West African Folktales - How Wisdom Became the Property of Human Race)

Authors: Amoako, Samuel Dadey;

The Dark-Light Reflection: Deconstructing Kwaku Ananse's Gourd and Okonore Yaa's Hearthstone. (West African Folktales - How Wisdom Became the Property of Human Race)

Abstract

This study examines symbolism in Akan folktales through a critical analysis of “How Wisdom Became the Property of the Human Race,”focusing on the conceptual framework of The Dark–Light Reflection. It explores how two symbolic constructs: Kwaku Ananse’s gourdand the culturally inferred hearthstone associated with Okonore Yaa, represent contrasting yet interconnected systems of knowledge,power, and social organization. Drawing on postcolonial feminist theory and supported by concepts such as othering, subalternity, andhybridity, the study interrogates how knowledge is produced, controlled, and distributed within the narrative.The analysis argues that Ananse’s gourd symbolizes the centralization, monopolization, and weaponization of knowledge, reflectinghierarchical and patriarchal systems that restrict access to wisdom in order to maintain authority. In contrast, Okonore Yaa’s hearthstoneis constructed symbolically as a site of communal, embodied, and sustaining knowledge, rooted in everyday practices such as caregiving,storytelling, and cultural transmission. Although not explicitly voiced in the narrative, Okonore Yaa represents the subaltern presence,whose knowledge systems are marginalized yet persist through lived experience and social continuity.Through the “reflection” between these two symbols, the study demonstrates that the hearthstone does not merely oppose the gourd butcorrects its excesses, revealing the limitations of authoritarian knowledge systems. The breaking of the gourd marks a shift fromknowledge as power to knowledge as practice, affirming that wisdom is inherently collective, dynamic, and dependent on communalparticipation. Ultimately, the study contributes to broader discussions on African oral literature by highlighting how folktales functionas critical sites for negotiating power, gender, and epistemology within cultural traditions.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback