Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

NARRATIVE STRUCTURES ACROSS LANGUAGES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FOLKTALE MOTIFS IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH TRADITIONS

Authors: Nilufar Maxmudovna Madraximova;

NARRATIVE STRUCTURES ACROSS LANGUAGES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FOLKTALE MOTIFS IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH TRADITIONS

Abstract

This comparative study investigates the structural, thematic, and linguistic organization of narrative motifs within Uzbek and English folktale traditions. Utilizing Vladimir Propp’s structural methodology outlined in Morphology of the Folktale, this research analyzes fifty traditional tales (twenty-five Uzbek pari/pahlavon narratives and twenty-five English fairy tales) to identify common plot archetypes, functional sequences, and language-specific mechanisms of expression. The findings demonstrate that while both traditions exhibit strong alignment with Propp’s thirty-one narrative functions—particularly initial lack, interdiction, departure, donor testing, and resolution—their linguistic realization reflects fundamental cultural and grammatical differences. Uzbek folktales rely heavily on agglutinative morphology, evidential verbs (-gan ekan), fixed formulaic opening/closing couplets, and Turkic epic motifs. Conversely, English folktales favor hypotactic sentence structures, temporal adverbial framing, and localized moralizing motifs. The study provides quantitative and qualitative evidence that narrative functions transcend linguistic boundaries, while morphosyntactic structures dictate the cognitive pace and stylistic delivery of folktale motifs.

Keywords

Narrative structures, Comparative folklore, Proppian analysis, Uzbek folktales, English fairy tales, Archetypal motifs, Morphology of the folktale, Evidentiality

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average