
This comparative study investigates the structural, thematic, and linguistic organization of narrative motifs within Uzbek and English folktale traditions. Utilizing Vladimir Propp’s structural methodology outlined in Morphology of the Folktale, this research analyzes fifty traditional tales (twenty-five Uzbek pari/pahlavon narratives and twenty-five English fairy tales) to identify common plot archetypes, functional sequences, and language-specific mechanisms of expression. The findings demonstrate that while both traditions exhibit strong alignment with Propp’s thirty-one narrative functions—particularly initial lack, interdiction, departure, donor testing, and resolution—their linguistic realization reflects fundamental cultural and grammatical differences. Uzbek folktales rely heavily on agglutinative morphology, evidential verbs (-gan ekan), fixed formulaic opening/closing couplets, and Turkic epic motifs. Conversely, English folktales favor hypotactic sentence structures, temporal adverbial framing, and localized moralizing motifs. The study provides quantitative and qualitative evidence that narrative functions transcend linguistic boundaries, while morphosyntactic structures dictate the cognitive pace and stylistic delivery of folktale motifs.
Narrative structures, Comparative folklore, Proppian analysis, Uzbek folktales, English fairy tales, Archetypal motifs, Morphology of the folktale, Evidentiality
Narrative structures, Comparative folklore, Proppian analysis, Uzbek folktales, English fairy tales, Archetypal motifs, Morphology of the folktale, Evidentiality
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
