Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Comparative definitions of the condition number in Stokes polarimetry

Authors: del Hoyo, Jesus; Joaquín, Andres-Porras; Soria-Garcia, Angela; SANCHEZ-BREA, LUIS MIGUEL; Alda, Javier;

Comparative definitions of the condition number in Stokes polarimetry

Abstract

In polarimetry, the condition number defines the stability and noise sensitivity that apolarimeter can achieve, being a key factor to understand its performance. In this work,we numerically calculate the error obtained for Stokes polarimetry with different numberof measurements and optimization strategies. Using these results, we show that not alldefinitions and metrics used in the scientific literature to calculate the condition numbersare physically robust and metrologically significant, and propose the best ones for predictingthe error in Stokes polarimetry. The selected definitions imply norms based on the singularvalue decomposition of the inverse, or pseudo inverse, of the instrument matrix associatedto the measurement procedure.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback