The eternal destiny of those who lived and died without hearing the Christian gospel remains one of the most difficult questions in Christian theology. The problem concerns people whose historical, cultural, or geographical circumstances made direct knowledge of Jesus Christ impossible. Can a perfectly loving and perfectly just God condemn a person for failing to accept a message that was never available to them? This article examines the destiny of the unevangelised through biblical, theological, and moral analysis. It considers strict exclusivism, inclusivism, universalism, conscience, general revelation, human freedom, divine judgment, and the unique saving work of Christ. It argues that salvation remains grounded in Jesus Christ while unavoidable ignorance must not be treated as deliberate rejection. God judges every person with complete knowledge of their opportunities, circumstances, conscience, intentions, and response to the truth genuinely available to them. The study concludes that geographical location, historical period, and lack of missionary access cannot themselves constitute grounds for condemnation. Christ remains the source of salvation, but the application of Christ’s saving work belongs to God rather than to the limits of human institutions or missionary reach. This approach preserves divine love, divine justice, the centrality of Christ, and meaningful human responsibility.