Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Impact of Target-Language Development Sets on Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Performance of Multilingual BERT in XNLI

Authors: Assignee Research;

Impact of Target-Language Development Sets on Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Performance of Multilingual BERT in XNLI

Abstract

Multilingual contextual embeddings have demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in zero-shot cross-lingual transfer learning, where multilingual BERT is fine-tuned on one source language and evaluated on a different target language. However, published results for mBERT zero-shot accuracy vary as much as 17 points on the MLDoc classification task across four papers. We show that the standard practice of using English dev accuracy for model selection in the zero-shot setting makes it difficult to obtain reproducible results on the MLDoc and XNLI tasks. English dev accuracy is often uncorrelateResearch goal: How does using target-language-specific development sets for model selection impact the zero-shot cross-lingual performance of multilingual BERT on the XNLI dataset compared to other multilingual language models like XLM-R or mT5, as measured by macro-averaged F1 scores across all languages?Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 8.8/10.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback