Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Cross-lingual Transfer Performance in XTREME-R: Intermediate Task Selection and Model Training Strategies

Authors: Assignee Research;

Cross-lingual Transfer Performance in XTREME-R: Intermediate Task Selection and Model Training Strategies

Abstract

In zero-shot cross-lingual transfer, a supervised NLP task trained on a corpus in one language is directly applicable to another language without any additional training. A source of cross-lingual transfer can be as straightforward as lexical overlap between languages (e.g., use of the same scripts, shared subwords) that naturally forces text embeddings to occupy a similar representation space. Recently introduced cross-lingual language model (XLM) pretraining brings out neural parameter sharing in Transformer-style networks as the most important factor for the transfer. In this paper, we aimResearch goal: Does the choice of intermediate task (e.g., natural language inference, sentiment analysis) affect the zero-shot cross-lingual transfer performance on the XTREME-R benchmark for typologically diverse languages when comparing English-trained versus multilingual-trained models?Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 7.9/10.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback