
Recursive AI-augmented software engineering introduces a new class of development systems in which autonomous agents operate within iterative feedback loops, generating, evaluating, and refining software artifacts at machine speed. Without explicit governance boundaries, these systems are prone to recursive optimization drift, complexity collapse, and misalignment with human-defined objectives. This paper introduces reflector, a framework for reflective development systems that imposes structured governance contracts on recursive AI-assisted workflows. reflector defines four core mechanisms: (1) scoped autonomous agents with bounded execution contexts, (2) human-in-the-loop alignment checkpoints triggered by milestone events, (3) recursive auditing systems that continuously validate system state against defined invariants, and (4) milestone synchronization protocols that gate autonomous progression. We describe the theoretical foundations of reflective development, characterize common failure modes arising from unbounded recursion, and present an architectural reference model for implementing reflector-compliant systems.
Pre-publication draft. DOI and arXiv identifiers pending formal submission. Author ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5291-9795
recursive development systems, AI safety, reflective systems, systems thinking, recursive drift, AI-augmented software engineering, autonomous agents, milestone synchronization, software governance, human-in-the-loop governance
recursive development systems, AI safety, reflective systems, systems thinking, recursive drift, AI-augmented software engineering, autonomous agents, milestone synchronization, software governance, human-in-the-loop governance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
