Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

The Phase-Change Ledger: Why a Finite Observer Must Melt Memory to Keep Reading

Authors: Huckstead, Jeffery;

The Phase-Change Ledger: Why a Finite Observer Must Melt Memory to Keep Reading

Abstract

A finite measuring apparatus cannot record indefinitely without thermodynamic cost. This paper studies a phase-changing detector medium that serves simultaneously as sensor, memory, and operating reservoir. In the frozen phase the medium can preserve a persistent record; in the melted phase it restores reusable sensing volume but erases part of that record. This coupling produces a trade-off between persistent memory and reusable reservoir, formalized here as a finite observer accounting architecture. We derive a pressure-control law for the frozen fraction, include the fixed-volume phase density correction, and identify a stability condition requiring latent cooling to dominate phase-volume feedback. We distinguish storage capacity from recoverable temporal order by introducing a freeze-front ordering field. Optical and thermal readout are treated as apparatus-corrected measurement channels, not as a closed entropy ledger. The individual formulas are standard or engineering prior art; the proposed contribution is the architecture tying phase change, pressure control, erasure, and apparatus cost into one finite-observer model. Black-hole finite-radius physics is treated only as a boundary correction through redshift, radar delay, proper acceleration, and quasi local thermodynamic fences. The finite shell keeps an apparatus-corrected record; exact asymptotic export accounting remains at null infinity.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!