Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Domain Adaptation of Multilingual Models for Cross-Lingual Retrieval in Low-Resource Languages on the mTREC Benchmark

Authors: Assignee Research;

Domain Adaptation of Multilingual Models for Cross-Lingual Retrieval in Low-Resource Languages on the mTREC Benchmark

Abstract

Multilingual Neural Machine Translation (NMT) excels in sharing knowledge across languages and transferring insights from high-resource languages to improve performance in low-resource languages. However, its performance lags in specific domains such as legal and medical. Previous works have focused on adding language-specific and domain-specific adapters to achieve domain adaptation. Although effective, these adapter-based methods only use domain data to train additional parameters, limiting the performance of multilingual NMT. In this paper, we propose CDSTX, a novel approach that achieves rResearch goal: To what extent does domain adaptation of multilingual models using in-domain data from high-resource languages improve cross-lingual retrieval accuracy on low-resource languages, as measured by precision and recall on the mTREC benchmark?Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 7.8/10.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback